3D Printing
News Videos Newsletter Contact us
Home / Medical / Clinical Reliability of FFF Printed PEEK Implants Quantified
qidi

Clinical Reliability of FFF Printed PEEK Implants Quantified

August 17, 2021

Machined PEEK plastic has been used in custom cranial implants for some time, as it is strong, light, and biocompatible. Recent efforts have yielded a range of printable medical-grade PEEK filaments with a focus on biocompatibility, and as a result, AM technology is now being used to produce custom cranial implants at the point of care (in the hospital).

FFF PEEK
FFF PEEK skull implant material of the future? (Image credit: IJMS)

As the popularity of the material’s usage increases, there are questions surrounding the reliability of implants 3D printed in PEEK.

Some of those reliability-related questions have been answered recently thanks to a research team from universities in Switzerland and Holland, who have published the results in a recent paper.

The paper offers a quantitative assessment of point of care (POC) manufactured, 3D-printed PEEK implants for cranial reconstruction through characterization of the geometrical, morphological, and biomechanical aspects of the implants in question.

In other words the paper is concerned with the clinical reliability of the FFF manufactured implants overall.

So why use FFF? Because this is the most common type of printing technology used in printers.

The study results revealed that the printed customized cranial implants had high dimensional accuracy and repeatability, and displayed clinically acceptable morphologic similarity concerning fit the continuity of the implant contours.

These factors are vitally important, as the implants are intended to improve the quality of life of the patient, and so repeatable quality, predictable geometry and fit are important to the comfort and wellbeing of the patient.

Mechanically speaking, it was noticed that the tested implants of various models had variable peak load values with discrete fracture patterns and failed at a mean (SD) peak load of 798.38 ± 211.45 N. That’s the equivalent of about 80kg of force (± around 20kg). Engineers among you may notice that is a fairly large range. This variability is explained as being a result of the bonding between layers, and the air gaps/porosity within the print.

fracture
Different fracture patterns for different prints (Image credit: IJMS)

The parts that could withstand higher forces before fracture were those with the most uniform interlayer bonding, and those that fractured under lower forces were those with greater air gaps between the filament tracks in the print.

The paper also states that when compared to sintered or machined PEEK implants, the FFF versions tested were able to retain their overall shape after the fracture better.

This lack of fragmentation in the FFF samples is apparently better for retrieval of failed implants – because surgeons don’t want to be rooting around for pieces of shattered plastic inside a patient’s head, presumably. Makes sense.

workflow
Workflow for characterizing PEEK skull implants (Image credit: IJMS)

Overall, the conclusion of the paper states that PEEK cranial implants printed with the FFF method has acceptable dimensional accuracy for the use in these implants, is repeatable, and has sufficient strength.

Further work apparently needs to be done to reduce the variability of the results in terms of the peak load the implants can withstand before failure. But overall, it seems that FFF PEEK implants are certainly an avenue worth exploring further, for reasons of machine accessibility and reduced fragmentation compared to molded and SLS’d implants in the same material.

The full paper titled “Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants” was published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences (IJMS) and is available (open access) at this link, if you would like to read more about the research.

evonik peek filament
Related Story
Evonik Releases World’s First PEEK Filament for Medical Implants
Share:
WhatsApp Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Buffer Reddit E-mail
About the author | Phillip Keane
Phillip is an aerospace engineer from UK. He is a graduate of Coventry University (UK), International Space University (France) and Nanyang Technological University (Singapore), where he studied Advanced Manufacturing at the Singapore Centre for 3D Printing.
Join our newsletter

Our newsletter is free & you can unsubscribe any time.

Latest posts

Scottish Maritime Project Shows Promise for 3D Printed Ship Components

A Scottish project using large-scale additive manufacturing for shipbuilding components has completed its second phase, demonstrating potential benefits for the maritime industry. The... read more »

News
Scottish Maritime Project Shows Promise for 3D Printed Ship Components

Navy Maintenance Center Uses 3D Printing to Replace Destroyer Pump Component at Fraction of Conventional Cost

The Southeast Regional Maintenance Center (SERMC) has successfully used 3D printing to manufacture a replacement cooling rotor for an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile... read more »

Military
Navy Maintenance Center Uses 3D Printing to Replace Destroyer Pump Component at Fraction of Conventional Cost

Rapid Fusion Launches AI Assistant for Large-Format 3D Printers

British manufacturer Rapid Fusion has introduced "Bob," an AI-powered assistant designed to optimize operations for its large-format 3D printing systems. The company developed... read more »

News
Rapid Fusion Launches AI Assistant for Large-Format 3D Printers

Creality Submits IPO Prospectus for Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing

Shenzhen-based 3D printer manufacturer Creality has submitted a prospectus to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for a main board listing. The company began... read more »

News
Creality Submits IPO Prospectus for Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing

Graphjet Technology Partners with Malaysian University on 3D-Printed Heat Sink Development

Graphjet Technology has entered into a collaboration agreement with the Centre for Materials Engineering and Smart Manufacturing (MERCU) at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM).... read more »

News
Graphjet Technology Partners with Malaysian University on 3D-Printed Heat Sink Development

Humtown drives US Manufacturing Comeback with Additive Sand Casting

Humtown Products, an Ohio-based company, is positioning itself to serve manufacturers looking to bring production back to the United States. The company specializes... read more »

News
Humtown drives US Manufacturing Comeback with Additive Sand Casting

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Releases Advanced Dataset for 3D Printing Quality Monitoring

Oak Ridge National Laboratory has released a comprehensive dataset for its Peregrine software, which monitors and analyzes parts created through powder bed additive... read more »

News
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Releases Advanced Dataset for 3D Printing Quality Monitoring

Creality Expands Flagship Lineup with K2 and K2 Pro 3D Printers

Creality has announced the launch of the K2 and K2 Pro, two new additions to its high-end K series. Built on a rigid... read more »

3D Printers
Creality Expands Flagship Lineup with K2 and K2 Pro 3D Printers

Farsoon and Stark Future Complete KLINGA Project, Producing Over 1,000 Titanium Parts

Farsoon Europe GmbH and Stark Future have completed the KLINGA Project, a collaborative engineering initiative that produced more than 1,000 titanium parts using... read more »

3D Printing Metal
Farsoon and Stark Future Complete KLINGA Project, Producing Over 1,000 Titanium Parts

Swiss Steel Group’s Ugitech Introduces Custom Wire for 3D Metal Printing

Swiss Steel Group and its French subsidiary Ugitech have launched UGIWAM wire, a new product designed for wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). The... read more »

3D Printing Metal
Swiss Steel Group's Ugitech Introduces Custom Wire for 3D Metal Printing

Social

  • Facebook Facebook 3D Printing
  • Linkedin Linkedin 3D Printing
Join our newsletter

Our newsletter is free & you can unsubscribe any time.

Featured Industries

  • Automotive
  • Aerospace
  • Construction
  • Dental
  • Environmental
  • Electronics
  • Fashion
  • Medical
  • Military
  • QIDI Tech Q1 Pro

    • - Print size: 245 x 245 x 245 mm
    • - 600mm/s max speed
    More details »
    $449.00 QIDI Store
    Buy Now
  • QIDI Tech X-Max 3

    • - Print size: 325 x 325 x 315 mm
    • - fully enclosed
    More details »
    $799.00 QIDI Store
    Buy Now
  • Snapmaker Artisan Premium 3-in-1

    • - Print size: 400 x 400 x 400 mm
    • - comes with enclosure
    More details »
    $2,999.00 Snapmaker
    Buy Now
  • QIDI Plus4

    • - Print size: 305 x 305 x 280 mm
    • - print temperature of 370°C
    More details »
    $799.00 QIDI Store
    Buy Now

Company Information

  • What is 3D Printing?
  • Contact us
  • Join our mailing list
  • Advertise with us
  • Media Kit
  • Nederland 3D Printing

Blog

  • Latest News
  • Use Cases
  • Reviews
  • 3D Printers
  • 3D Printing Metal

Featured Reviews

  • Anycubic Photon Mono M5s
  • Creality Ender 5 S1
  • The Mole 3D Scanner
  • Flashforge Creator 3 Pro

Featured Industries

  • Automotive
  • Aerospace
  • Construction
  • Dental
  • Environmental
  • Electronics
  • Medical
  • Military
  • Fashion
  • Art
2025 — Strikwerda en Dehue
  • Home
  • Join our mailing list
  • Contact us
Blog
  • Latest News
  • Use Cases
  • Reviews
  • 3D Printers
  • 3D Printing Metal
Featured Industries
  • Automotive
  • Aerospace
  • Construction
  • Dental
  • Environmental
  • Electronics
  • Medical
  • Military
  • Fashion
  • Art
Company Information
  • What is 3D Printing?
  • Contact us
  • Join our mailing list
  • Advertise with us
  • Media Kit
  • Nederland 3D Printing